By Howard B. Owens Jul 15, 2015, 8:32am polls Brian Graz A better question would be... A better question would be... How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal? I'll be the first to answer: I don't and doubt anybody does. Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 1:28pm Permalink C. M. Barons In case anyone wants to read In case anyone wants to read the document, here it is. Spares one from relying on either ignorance or worse- the media-spun versions. http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/full-text-of-the-iran-… Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 2:47pm Permalink Raymond Richardson "How many of you who voted "How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?" *raises hand* Only because I read other news sites, like CNN.com and the washingtonpost.com before reading the Batavian, and saw the deal there yesterday. Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 5:58pm Permalink Bea McManis "How many of you who voted "How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?" *raises hand* The results of this poll are almost predetermined. Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 11:51pm Permalink C. M. Barons Four deal-breaking aspects of Four deal-breaking aspects of the agreement: 1) It was not negotiated by a Republican, 2) It was an Obama initiative, 3) It provides negligible opportunities for military contractors to profit and 4) It's a multi-national agreement. Log in or register to post comments Jul 16, 2015, 12:49pm Permalink
Brian Graz A better question would be... A better question would be... How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal? I'll be the first to answer: I don't and doubt anybody does. Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 1:28pm Permalink
C. M. Barons In case anyone wants to read In case anyone wants to read the document, here it is. Spares one from relying on either ignorance or worse- the media-spun versions. http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/full-text-of-the-iran-… Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 2:47pm Permalink
Raymond Richardson "How many of you who voted "How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?" *raises hand* Only because I read other news sites, like CNN.com and the washingtonpost.com before reading the Batavian, and saw the deal there yesterday. Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 5:58pm Permalink
Bea McManis "How many of you who voted "How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?" *raises hand* The results of this poll are almost predetermined. Log in or register to post comments Jul 15, 2015, 11:51pm Permalink
C. M. Barons Four deal-breaking aspects of Four deal-breaking aspects of the agreement: 1) It was not negotiated by a Republican, 2) It was an Obama initiative, 3) It provides negligible opportunities for military contractors to profit and 4) It's a multi-national agreement. Log in or register to post comments Jul 16, 2015, 12:49pm Permalink
A better question would be...
A better question would be... How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?
I'll be the first to answer: I don't and doubt anybody does.
In case anyone wants to read
In case anyone wants to read the document, here it is. Spares one from relying on either ignorance or worse- the media-spun versions. http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/world/full-text-of-the-iran-…
"How many of you who voted
"How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?"
*raises hand*
Only because I read other news sites, like CNN.com and the washingtonpost.com before reading the Batavian, and saw the deal there yesterday.
"How many of you who voted
"How many of you who voted really know the complete details of the deal?"
*raises hand*
The results of this poll are almost predetermined.
Four deal-breaking aspects of
Four deal-breaking aspects of the agreement: 1) It was not negotiated by a Republican, 2) It was an Obama initiative, 3) It provides negligible opportunities for military contractors to profit and 4) It's a multi-national agreement.