We don't know yet who leaked a complaint letter to the Daily News, but two council members say that Councilman Bob Bialkowski is the person who brought the original letter to the council.
Bialkowski also reportedly told a council member that he would divulge the contents of the letter if City Manager Jason Molino received a pay raise.
Council President Charlie Mallow and Councilwoman Kathy Briggs both confirmed that letter first came to the council through Bialkowski.
"That's highly unusual," Mallow said. "Complaints usually come through the council president or the city attorney. We treat all complaints we get equally. But that's not normal."
We've left a message for Bialkowski on his home phone. Yesterday, The Batavian left two messages for Bialkowski asking him to respond to our survey of council members. Bialkowski has not responded to our email, answered the questions or returned phone calls.
Councilman Bill Cox said he had no knowledge of Bialkowski bringing the letter to the council. He thought it came through Councilwoman Marianne Clattenburg, whom he thought had the letter two or three weeks before it was discussed in closed session.
Briggs said that prior to the vote on Molino's raise, another council member called her and said that Bialkowski was threatening to make the contents of the letter public if the council approved Molino's raise, and Briggs said, "What letter?"
She said at that point, she hadn't received the letter and referred to it as "the first letter" that went to only "select council members" from Bialkowski.
Briggs said she believes Bialkwoski brought forward two letters from the same person, and it is the second one that the council reviewed in closed session.
Mallow said he wasn't aware of a "first letter." Cox wasn't aware of there being more than one letter.
Following the closed session where the letter was discussed, four council members -- Briggs, Mallow, Rose Mary Christian and Clattenberg -- received phone calls from the letter's author discussing the substance of, in some detail, though with inaccuracies, the things individual council members said during the closed discussion.
Both Mallow and Briggs said that it's clear that a council member discussed the meeting afterwards with somebody not at the meeting, which made it possible for the letter writer to learn what was discussed behind closed doors.
Bialkowski was not at that Sept. 14 meeting, which was the same night the council voted on Molino's pay raise.
Cox voted against the pay raise, and after the meeting, first characterized his "no" vote as related to a personnel issue he would not discuss publicly. Later he issued a statement that criticized the timing of the raise.
This afternoon, in a phone conversation with The Batavian, Cox agreed that there would be nothing wrong with a council member who was present at a closed session calling a member of the council who missed the meeting and discussing what was said in executive session.
We then asked Cox if he called Bialkowski after the closed door meeting and Cox said he would rather not comment on that question.
While Bialkowski missed the vote on Molino's raise this year, he was present a year ago, June 23, 2008, and voted "yes" on that year's raise for Molino. Bialkowski has been a member of the council since Jan. 1, 2008.
Molino was on vacation the night of the council voted on his raise, which is the same night the council first discussed the complaint letter. Sources say the council delayed further discussion of the complaint until Molino could be present to reply to the charges. Before the council could meet again, the letter was leaked to the Daily News and now at least five council members are unwilling to enter into an executive session without confidence that statements made in a closed session will remain confidential.
UPDATE: Councilman Frank Ferrando just returned our call. He said it was his understanding the letter was brought forward by Bialkowski, but he never heard of Bialkowski threatening to release the letter if Molino received a raise.
Previously:
- Mallow: Council member who leaked document should resign
- Today's Poll: Should the council member(s) who leaked personnel information from a closed session resign?
- 'Council antics' don't pass 'smell test,' asserts Councilman Cox
- Most council members answer straightforward questions about leak of personnel information
- The power of Grand Juries in New York to investigate government actions
As blahtavia turns.
As blahtavia turns.
Council, Enough. Get your
Council,
Enough. Get your collective crap together, none of you were elected for these kinds of shenanigans.
Dan
Hmmm....So....does this mean
Hmmm....So....does this mean the the Council is now leaking information about the leak??
Great comment Dan Jones. Ditto
We need a score sheet.
We need a score sheet.
Tim, everything I got was on
Tim, everything I got was on the record and sourced. All of my conversations were on the record. Further, none of the points discussed are part of any confidential meeting or document. To use the word "leak" associated with anything disclosed here is inaccurate.
Big city "make them sweat"
Big city "make them sweat" reporting in little ol' Batavia, New York. Good job Howard, I hope nobody on the Council ever actually commits a crime or at least, I wouldn't want to be that person if he or she did. Do they still have a pillory on the Courthouse Square? (That's a joke Bea).
Sounds like Bob and Bill have
Sounds like Bob and Bill have some explaining to do?
And the plot thickens. John
And the plot thickens. John isnt there some kind of system, when filing a complaint with the city? Why did a member of council deliver it? Im still waiting for Jason to answer to the charges alleged against him. All this other stuff isnt going to make us forget, about the real reason council is going through this malarky. It stems from a complaint that wasnt even filed properly. My My My
Is anyone else thoroughly
Is anyone else thoroughly confused, not to mention disgusted with all this nonsense? I really hope the Town and City do NOT merge, because then I will actually have to pay attention to this garbage.
Karen, No, there is no
Karen,
No, there is no “system”. Usually a complaint on anything is just sent to the City Manager, who then either takes care of it, or brings it to council’s attention.
Or it goes to the Council President if it is about the Manager. You can bet they will write a procedure now.
But this time it now appears the letter writer sent it to Bob Bialkowski and it will be interesting to learn why.
As for Jason answering the complaint, he has to have council ask him about it first and they will not until they know what they say will not be leaked again.
And, on top of all that, the letter may not be the truth or even that serious to warrant any action (we don’t know).
I want to know if Bob tried to really blackmail the rest of council to not give Jason a raise?
Curiouser &
Curiouser & curiouser...........the beat goes on!!!
tp, You just can’t make this
tp,
You just can’t make this stuff up.
lol(:
lol(:
John wrote "I want to know if
John wrote "I want to know if Bob tried to really blackmail the rest of council to not give Jason a raise? "
John, I can only report that Bob called one council member and made that statement. And keep in mind, out of fairness, I don't have that statement from the person Bob reportedly called, but a third-party council member.
I'm sure every council member is aware of this: If they call a quorum number of council members, they've engaged in a serial meeting, which violates the open meeting law (I'm pretty sure that's true in New York -- I'm sure it's true in California).
Why didn't council hold up
Why didn't council hold up the vote on Malino's raise until all this was cleared up..Leaking what ever letter was leaked was wrong..Very wrong,and not fessing up to it is wrong .But if the matter had been cleared up before handing out a raise this might not be a issue right now..If any of what was in this so called complaint letter was true, should he of still gotten a raise..
Mark, I'll have another story
Mark, I'll have another story coming later, much later tonight (from the looks of it), or in the morning ... and I'm not sure if or how this will work into the story.
But as I piece things together -- the timing of things, the Council met its obligation to review Jason's performance just before this letter came to light, so it needed to follow through, by contract, with the raise.
Keep in mind, it seems that the raise was late in coming (remember, a portion of it was retroactive), and this came to light very late in the process.
And it's not even clear that the nature of the complaint rises to the level that Jason wouldn't have gotten his raise anyway.
Damn Howard. That's quite a
Damn Howard. That's quite a teaser. I'm going to sit right here all night until you post an update. I took a vacation day tomorrow. Like John said - you can't make this stuff up.
Thanks Howard..Good job
Thanks Howard..Good job reporting on this one..Seems to me since the Daily wasn't going to publish this letter anyways,they could off handled finding the so called Rat a different way then stirring up all this ..
The Daily is hamstrung. They
The Daily is hamstrung. They know who the leaker is, so they can't honestly go out and investigate it. Anything they found out would put them in a position of violating a promise to a source, which no journalist will do. I mean, just for the record, if the shoe was on the other foot and something was leaked to me, I wouldn't do anything that might violate that promise.
When i say they i meant city
When i say they i meant city council...Isn't the issue a complaint against Malino..