Most council members answer straightforward questions about leak of personnel information
Last night I e-mailed five questions to each of the nine members of the Batavia City Council related to the reported leak of information from a confidential personnel closed session. Five of the council members cooperated by answering the questions directly. Two others did respond, and three have yet to respond (in addition to the questions, I've telephoned each council member who has not answered three times and twice left messages).
Below are the questions and responses.
1. Did you call any member of the public, including but not limited to, the person who wrote the letter in question, after the closed session (or did this person call you and then you revealed the substance of the closed session to the caller)?
Charlie Mallow: "The only contact I have made was this weekend was to send an apology note that the information was leaked." 'No' answers from Frank Ferrando, Tim Buckley, Marianne Clattenburg and Kathy Briggs.
2. Did you call any member of the media following the meeting and discuss, either on the record or off, the content of the closed session?
'No' answers from Mallow, Ferrando, Buckley, Clattenburg, Briggs.
3. Did you provide Joanne Beck or any other member of the media, or any member of the public, a copy of the letter in question?
'No' answers from Mallow, Ferrando, Buckley, Clattenburg, Briggs.
4. In the spirit of Frank Ferrando's statement during tonight's meeting: Are you willing to release Joanne Beck and/or the editors of the Daily News from any promise of confidentiality and let her release your name if you are the council member who leaked the letter or otherwise discussed the matter off-the-record or on background or as an unnamed source?
'Yes' answers from Mallow, Ferrando, Buckley, Clattenburg, Briggs.
Ferrando also included: "I am willing to have Joanne release my name if indeed I am the person who leaked this information. I release any possible promise."
5. Do you agree or disagree that the council should not meet in closed session again until this matter is resolved to each member's satisfaction?
Mallow, Buckley, Clattenburg and Briggs also said either "I agree" or "No further meetings."
Ferrando wrote:
I believe we should take the recommendation of our attorney George Van Ness and include in our Council rules the confidentiality of Executive Session. Until then, I am reluctant to meet in an executive session where privacy, particularly involving individuals, is not respected. In my estimation, someone on our Council was looking to assassinate the character of a person without allowing the individual the Constitutional rights everyone is guaranteed.
City governments are public entities and the rights of ALL of our citizens, under the constitution, must be clearly noted and protected. Whoever did this is, in my opinion, a coward for not stepping forward and owning up to his or her actions. As public officials we take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the U.S. and the Charter of the City. If someone deviates from that sacred trust, they should have the courage to step forward and explain why it was so important to have done so and accept the consequence of such action if deemed by the public to be unacceptable. That's the way our democratic system works and why our system of governance is so special. For a publicly elected representative to hide behind the confidentiality of a person in the media is also appalling because it casts suspicion on the innocent. That is why I am so intent. as are my colleagues, on finding out who this was because until then it casts doubt and suspicion on all members of Council. In any case Howard, you have my answers to the questions posed.
Councilman Bill Cox sent an written statement, which I posted previously. I sent another e-mail to Mr. Cox and asked if he would respond directly to the questions. He wrote back: "The city attorney advised us not to answer any questions about the executive session." By reply, I pointed out none of the quesitons dealt with what happened in closed session, but what happened after closed session. I have not received a response.
Councilman Sam Barone wrote: "Howard, I will not be responding to these questions. Sam."
I have yet to hear at all from Council members Bob Bialkowski and Rose Mary Christian.