Quantcast
Skip to main content

Today's Poll: Should ball players believed to have used steroids be barred from the Hall of Fame?

Raymond Richardson
RRichardson's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 18 2012

They should also be stripped of any records they may hold as well.

Barry Bonds comes to mind.

Dave Olsen
daveo's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 12 2008
Member

It doesn't need to be anything formal. The people who vote on induction make the decision based on their votes. It appears obvious where they stand. I am happy that the triple crown was broken post-steroid, and the ironman stat (consecutive games) was broken by a guy noone suspects of PED usage. Now someone needs to break the home run records and all will be well again.

Dave Olsen
daveo's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 12 2008
Member

Time is the great healer, Bonds, Sosa, McGuire, Roger Clemons are not getting in. Time will forget them. The big question for me is: Why not lift the Pete Rose ban? Geez, c'mon did he hurt the game that much?

Jack Dorf
JDorf's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 12 2010

Believed no, proven yes.

Tim Miller
TMiller's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 20 2010
Member

@Dave - did Rose hurt baseball that much? Probably not. But he broke one of the cardinal rules - bet on his own team. That puts into question any game he coached during that time.

More importantly, though, was that he broke the rule, lied about breaking it (pretty much just a continuation of the offense), was issued punishment, and claimed to accept said punishment. If MLB were to reverse or relieve that punishment, what (dis)incentive would the next person have to not bet on baseball?

Sorry, Mr. Rose - you did the crime, you do the time. Period.

Dave Olsen
daveo's picture
Offline
Joined: Oct 12 2008
Member

Tim. I understand all of that. But pro sports is rife with gambling, I believe. The Bills got fined over not reporting Mario Williams' lameness, because it screws up the betting lines. Of course, I'm only guessing here, but it stands to reason that a manager might be told for instance to sit a player in order to keep his potential free agent value down, so the team can re-sign him. I'm sure we can think of plenty of other real possibilities. I just feel that barring him from the H O F is highly hypocritical.

Yes, he bet on his teams, but not against them. But hey, the big boys don't care what I think anyways.

Premium Drupal Themes