Chris Collins voted, yes, on a bill to make overtime pay optional. ...And it passed!
Subcommittee chaired by Collins examines health insurance tax
Submitted by Howard B. Owens on May 9, 2013 - 12:55pm
House Small Business Subcommittee on Health and Technology Chairman Chris Collins (NY-27) today led a hearing to examine the economic effects of the upcoming health care law’s insurance tax on small businesses. Beginning in 2014, the health care law imposes a new tax on the health insurance policies that most small businesses purchase. The amount of the tax will be $8 billion in 2014, increasing to $14.3 billion in 2018, and increase based on premium trend thereafter.
Among today’s witnesses was Dean Norton, an Elba resident and president of the New York State Farm Bureau. Norton testified about the impact of the tax on farmers.
“The health care law is a massive piece of legislation that is making a major impact on our lives and the economy overall,” Chairman Collins said. “The numerous mandates, requirements and taxes, such as the health insurance tax (HIT), are driving up the cost for small businesses to provide health insurance for their employees. This assessment is not a partisan attack. This is a fact, substantiated by independent studies. Both the Joint Committee on Taxation and the Congressional Budget Office, among others, have said they expect a very large portion of this tax to be passed through to the purchasers of insurance in the form of higher premiums, driving up the cost of insurance for families and small businesses.”
“Although the law exempts self-funded insurance plans, small businesses typically do not qualify to self-insure, leaving them to pay higher premiums in a fully funded group plan,” continued Collins. “This law is bad for our economy. Without any relief in sight, it appears that the law will continue to be an anchor holding down small businesses.”
A recent NFIB Research Foundation study estimated that the tax will raise the cost of employer-sponsored insurance by 2 percent to 3 percent, imposing a cost of nearly $5,000 per family by 2020. The study also projects the price increases caused by the tax will reduce private sector employment by up to 262,000 jobs by 2020, with 59 percent of the losses falling in the small business sector.
A 2011 report by actuarial firm Oliver Wyman provided national estimates of the impact of the tax on health insurance premiums. The report found the insurance tax alone “will increase premiums in the insured market on average by 1.9 percent to 2.3 percent in 2014” and by 2023 “will increase premiums by 2.8 percent to 3.7 percent.”
Materials for the hearing are posted on the House Small Business Committee’s Web site HERE.
Dean Norton, president of New York Farm Bureau in Elba, NY, said, “…health insurance costs for small businesses are already rapidly trending higher, increasing 103 percent since 2000. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the HIT tax will further increase family premiums by $400 or 2.5 percent in the year 2016, making it even harder for farmers to purchase coverage for themselves, their families and their employees.”
William Dennis Jr., senior research fellow at NFIB Foundation in Washington, DC, said, “The health insurance premium tax was one of the largest revenue components included in the original law to offset the budgetary costs posed by PPACA. Formally structured as a fee on health insurers, this tax was intended to raise more than $100 billion over a decade beginning in 2014. However, both government and independent analysts believe that the tax will be passed on to consumers in the form of higher health insurance premiums.
“The tax falls almost exclusively on small businesses. Their larger competitors have no equivalent obligation. Small businesses, therefore, are asked to absorb a significant share of the financial load of the program while placing them in a less competitive position to do so.”
Ryan P. Thorn, of Ryan P. Thorn Insurance Planning in South Jordan, Utah, said, “The new national health insurance fee that will be imposed on all individual and fully insured group health insurance policies sold in this country from 2014 and forward will impact about 45 percent of all insured residents in Utah. These are the people who are covered by individual, private Medicare and group policies that are fully insured. This means that all risk for the policies is borne by the insurance company. These are the only type of policies that are impacted by the new tax, which means that the Americans who work for and own small businesses around the country are disproportionately affected.”
Dean Norton, President of New York Farm Bureau in Elba, NY said, “…health insurance costs for small businesses are already rapidly trending higher, increasing 103 percent since 2000. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, the HIT tax will further increase family premiums by $400 or 2.5 percent in the year 2016, making it even harder for farmers to purchase coverage for themselves, their families and their employees.”
Why isn't he complaining about the 6.3% projected increase on premiums?????? Never-mind. That would be complaining about corporate profits.
I would have loved the option to take extra time off instead of the money when I was mandated to work overtime.
Maybe CM can tell us why a worker should not be allowed a choice?
Workers should and employers should be able to barter in lieu of cash as well, especially part time workers.
So many hours for so many dollars worth of groceries, etc. if you really want to 'EMPOWER' the working man so to speak, they should be able to legally exchange their services for something they truly need. Some would want money, some would want merchandise or some combination of.
Maybe John can explain how a comp-day pays the bills or puts food on the table? This bill does not read like a boon to employees looking for the option of a day off. It reads like a detour for employers, enabling them to give 1:1 time off instead of 1.5:1 in overtime pay. For many hourly employees overtime pay amounts to the difference between survival and debt. I'm glad that John was well-compensated to the extent he could enjoy extra time off. I do not see the cause for celebrating when employees are required to work in excess of 8/40 hours without benefit of enhanced compensation. Interesting that the Republicans can easily squash a minimum wage bill one week and pass a overtime-pay-killing bill the next while spouting family values platitudes as if fair wages and family values are alien concepts. ...Further indication why Republicans are dinosaurs on the verge of extinction.
The bill gives the employee the option to take the time or the money. It gives protection to the employee and has a sunset provision (5 years).
Read HR 1406
Republicans were considered dinosaurs on the verge of extinction in 1863 when Lincoln could not win re-nomination and was forced to run under the new union party. Yet they survived.
Republicans were considered dinosaurs on the verge of extinction in 1912 when Theodore Roosevelt broke from the party and ran on the Bull Moose ticket and caused a very popular President Taft to loose to the wildly progressive Woodrow Wilson, yet 8 short years later the very conservative Warren Harding was elected overwhelmingly and we entered the roaring twenties.
Republicans were considered on the verge of distinction when the ultimate libertarian Barry Goldwater was crushed by Lyndon Johnson in the election of 1964, and many thought the nail was in the coffin after Watergate, yet we saw the rise of Ronald Reagan.
CM, the pendulum of politics swings every 8-12 years, 40% of the nation considers itself liberal, 40 % conservative and 20% are on the pendulum. That pendulum swung way left in 2008, and all evidence is it is swinging back to the right as stupid laws like the safe act are enacted.
It really isn't a democrat -republican thing it is a progressive-conservative thing and that will always sway back and forth as the trade off for progressive thought is less personal liberty and the trade off for conservative thought is self reliance over government reliance.
And incidentally, the Democrats did not gives us the 40 hour work week in the first place, Henry Ford did as a means to attract higher quality workers from his growing competition. (Oh that nasty free market thing!) Government should not be in the trade and pay negotiation business at all.
The bill does just what a free society should, allow workers and employers to negotiate their own payment and or compensation.
I could care less if it was a Republican or Democrat idea. If it passed and the protections enforced, it gives workers a choice. And I fail to see how giving a worker a choice is bad.