Skip to main content

Plans for new $5.1 million County Airport terminal move forward

By Howard B. Owens

The county's Public Service Committee recommended approval Tuesday of four construction contracts for a new airport terminal with an expected expenditure of $5.1 million.

That's about $800,000 less than Highway Superintendent Tim Hens originally estimated for the job.

State and federal grants will pay for about 20 percent of the terminal and the county will bond the remaining $4 million.

Once approved by the full Legislature, contracts will be awarded to: Building Innovation Group, of East Rochester, a general contractor, for $3.3 million; Hewitt Young Electric, of Rochester, for $600,000; Nairy Mechanical, of Union Hill, for $550,000; and HMI Mechanical Systems, of Lyons, for $660,000.

C&S Engineers, of Syracuse, is also receiving up to nearly $400,000 for engineering work on the project.

In all, 31 bids were received on the four different construction contracts -- general contractor, HAVC, electrical and plumbing. Hens said the recommended companies all met the lowest, responsible bidder criteria for bid specification.

Hens showed up the plans for the new terminal to legislators and reiterated that the project is necessary both because of the poor condition of the current terminal and its proximity to the airport's runway.

Repairing the building would cost more than $500,000 and Hens said, "even if we wanted to spend the money, I'm not sure the FAA would let us."

The current terminal violates current FAA regulations for being a fixed object within 200 feet of the runway and is not even within the bounds for allowable moveable objects.

While allowing that an accident is unlikely, it wouldn't be good for the county if there is one, Hens said.

"You could have a plane veer off runway and hit one of our buildings and there could be potentially be liability involved," Hens said.

The new building will have modern amenities, an attractive design and be more comfortable for pilots with layovers in Batavia, but it won't be extravagant.

"There's nothing super fancy in the new facility," Hens said. "Everything is meant to be very low maintenance and practical.

While as a matter of energy efficiency, the building would qualify for LEED certification (and be the first such building owned by the county), Hens said he has no intention of applying for certification.

"I don't feel it's worth spending $25,000 or $30,000 just to have a plaque to hang the wall," Hens said.

The new terminal will only be about 1,000 square feet larger than the current terminal, which was built in 1964, but will use space more efficiently, Hens said.

Hens said about three or four corporate jets fly into the Genesee County Airport every week. Some of those jets bring executives from businesses already located in the area, but some of them are bringing site selectors and executives looking for new business locations. That makes the airport terminal a pretty important facility for the county.

"Our airport is a first impression for a lot of folks," Hens said. "The first impression on people who are going to have a big impact on the long-term future of our county."

Mark Potwora

State and federal grants will pay for about 20 percent of the terminal and the county will bond the remaining $4 million.....The county tax payer is going to spend 4 million dollars for 3 or 4 corporate jets that land here a week...Hens said about three or four corporate jets fly into the Genesee County Airport every week.

.The terminal that is there is fine..Roads and bridges are more important to spend 4 million on then a terminal that only those who fly a plane recreationally use.Charge a fee on all who land and take off, to make up the 4 million...No county taxpayer dollars should be used for this...If tolls and fees are good enough for those who drive on the thruway then those who fly their planes at the airport should also pay for any and all upkeep..We are staffing the county airport with county employees ..This should also be done away with..Sell the airport like they are selling the nursing home.

Oct 15, 2014, 8:27pm Permalink
Brian Graz

I couldn't agree more. The county can't afford to finance the nursing home, but spending $4Million on an airport upgrade for 3-4 corporate planes per week is a good use of taxpayer money???

I also agree that the airport should be privatized just as the nursing home.

Oct 15, 2014, 6:16pm Permalink
david spaulding

sounds to me like it's a done deal........ nothing we can do but foot the bill.......
I am wondering why the highway super. is so into this airport.. maybe we need to find one who is more focused on the falling apart roads and bridges. when is the superintendent's job up for election anyways?

Oct 15, 2014, 6:51pm Permalink
Thomas Schneider

"I don't feel it's worth spending $25,000 or $30,000 just to have a plaque to hang the wall," Hens said.

...but it's worth it to spend $4,600,000 building a new terminal ? Tell the FAA to buzz off and renovate what's there, since when does the FAA run County Government anyway?

Maybe they could kill two or three birds with one stone, make it the Airport Terminal-County Jail-City Police Department.

Oct 15, 2014, 10:20pm Permalink

Authentically Local