I am still of the opinion that the council member that said that is arrogant. There is an an exsisting ordinance, and it needs to be enforced. I agree with Rosemary, theres always an excuse because there are homes with no one with financial reasons, or health issues that dont shovel or snowblow. In some cases they are landlords that dont give a damn as well.
The ordinance is in the books, the city has code enforcement officers that have a job, code enforcement. You get a ticket for it or even get your sidewalks cleared by the city? The use the opportunity to go to court and show the VALID reason why. In the case of people who have no separation from the road or get plowed in by the city then the city should eat that cost and clear it themselves. Everything I heard sounded like enabling to me. Under which the city can show favoritism to those who get them into office
(That referenced the excuse heard last night that maybe it's someone who isnt here when the snow falls. Seems to me if you have the health and finances to travel then you are able to make arrangements for a 2.5 ft path made on the sidewalks of your property)



Apparently Ms. Christian is physically able to clear off her sidewalks unlike some who are unable to due to health reasons. Financial reasons, as well make it difficult to pay someone to keep them clean. Not everyone is as "damm lazy" as she believes.