I dunno about that Dave, Jim Nigro gets some nice photos around those wastwater ponds and it makes me sentimental. If they want to remove my sentiment then I think a few thousand would distract me enough to do the trick.
lol
Submitted by Howard Owens on January 23, 2013 - 1:11am

Given the backdrop of a proposed city budget that reduces local property taxes by 14.58 percent, various department heads sat before the Batavia City Council tonight and explained some of their funding needs.
The annual budget work session gives council members a chance to understand how taxpayer money will be spent and to ask questions, and even challenge, some of the budgeting decisions.
The discussion comes a week after City Manager Jason Molino presented the council with a proposed budget that reduces spending from a 2012 total of $15.8 million to $15.2 million for 2013.
Most of the savings comes from a proposal to change the way garbage is collected in the city.
For the past three decades, Genesee ARC has picked up residential garbage and recycling, with residents leaving their household waste by the curb in bags, cans and boxes.
The proposed new system would give each city residential property -- and some businesses -- at least two totes for refuse and recycling that could be collected by trucks fitted to dump the cans automatically.
According to Molino's budget, this would save -- especially if Allied/Republic is selected over Genesee ARC as the vendor for the new service -- some $218,000 in the first year.
That's a 21-percent reduction in expenses over what it would take to keep things as they are.
The city's tax rate would go down from $10.71 per $1,000 of assessed value to $9.15.
The tax rate could conceivably go down even more, but the city is faced with a nearly $300,000 increase -- mandated, non-negotiable -- in pension costs.
For the third year in a row, the assessed value of city property has not increased.
With that backdrop, here are some key points from tonight's discussion:

I dunno about that Dave, Jim Nigro gets some nice photos around those wastwater ponds and it makes me sentimental. If they want to remove my sentiment then I think a few thousand would distract me enough to do the trick.
lol
If "sidewalks are legally the resident's responsibility" then I believe I have the option of replacing the sidewalk or not. If sidewalks are the resident's responsibility, why there are areas (for example: Naramore Dr area, Burke Dr, Genesee St.) with no sidewalks?
Ted,
At one time there was no City code that required sidewalks. Some have them and as you know some do not. There is now for any new street.
At one time the City use to tell you your sidewalk needed repair. You could do it yourself or have a contractor do it, but it had to pass a City inspection. Or the City DPW would do it and add the cost to your taxes over a 10 year period.
But then Council decided to give you something for nothing and said the City would take care of repair at no cost to you. That was bull of course, the cost was in taxes. Then to hold down taxes, they did not keep up with the repairs. If they went back to the prior system, I bet within ten years or less our walks would be in good shape again.
John, my question is why is it my responsibility. If it is mandated by the city, it then becomes the city's responsibility. It is unfair for me to maintain the integrity of my sidewalk when others did not have them installed.
I have no problem with fixing my own sidewalks, as long as:
A.) My taxes drop the amount the city was going to pay, and,
B.) I can choose who does them and what they look like.
Phil,
I don't think your taxes would go down if you did it yourself, but you should be allowed soemthing like a voucher for the set cost of repair by the City.
Maybe get a rebate if you come in under the set cost and foot the bill if you go over.
I know of two houses in the city that wanted a type of brick sidewalk in front of their homes. They meet the City codes and were allowed. Both look very nice.
Main point is that before the City offered something for "free", the walks were mostly in good shape and the system for repair worked.
Why have sidewalks to begin with? Every time I go through Batavia's residental streets most people are walking in the street anyway. Especially this time of year. The City cites it is the home owner's responsibility and the home owner cites they pay taxes so, it is the city's responsibility. So why not just get rid of you sidewalks and give yourself another 3'-4' of usable yard or a parking space?
Sorry, Howard, but I just couldn't stop myself: "..a budget for removing sentiment from one of the waste water facility's treatment ponds" Pretty sure you meant sediment. I don't think anyone has sentiment for waste water. LOL I could be wrong, but I don't think so. In your defense, i'm sure it's a stupid auto-correct program. I hate those things.