Skip to main content

Corfu trustees retroactively authorize hiring seven police officers after oversight discovered

By Howard B. Owens

Over the past several years, the Village of Corfu has hired police officers without the Board of Trustees ratifying the new hires.

The apparent oversight came up during a discussion Monday night of Mayor Ralph Peterson hiring two part-time police officers.

Peterson acknowledge that he hired the officers. He said the village department will need more manpower in July because Darien Lake has a packed concert schedule for the month.

Mark Boylan, attorney for the village, said that in the past week it's come to his attention the police officers hired in recent years were hired without being properly ratified by a vote of the trustees.

Those past hires without board approval do not justify new hires by Peterson without board authorization, Boylan said.

Trustees expressed concern that the two new officers were hired without interviews, filling out an application form or passing a background check.

Village resident Greg Lang said he saw the two new officers working on Sunday and Officer Gene Nati said he worked with one of the officers on Sunday.

Before the end of the meeting, the trustees agreed that seven officers had been hired without proper board authorization and passed a resolution authorizing all seven hires.

Peterson is expected to interview the two new officers and ask that the board ratify their employment at a future board meeting.

Trustee Art Ianni expressed frustration that Peterson hired two officers -- an expenditure of $5,000 or $6,000 -- without board discussion.

"Can't we have a little discussion here?" Ianni asked.

Peterson said the new hires were within budget.

Lang accused Peterson of trying ram through the hires and once again being "dictatorial."

"Don't say I've got to stop talking," Lang said. "I'm a taxpayer in this community. One of the highest taxpayers in this community and this is ridiculous. What's going on, Rosie? You keep just going and going and going. What's going to be the next meeting, Rosie? I can't stand it any more, sitting here looking at this. It's absolutely ridiculous."

The meeting started with an update on the joint Pembroke-Corfu sewer project.

Bids have been received from contractors and the cost of Corfu's part of the project will run $750,000 more than budgeted. 

Both Corfu and Pembroke have received Department of Environmental Conservation grants for the project -- for Corfu, grants to help pay for upgrades to the sewer treatment plant and for Pembroke grants to help pay for transmission lines.

The state favors the project moving forward as a joint facility because of the potential economic development in the area, which is why the Genesee County Economic Development Center is putting in more than $800,000 into the project.

Bids for Pembroke's share the project are approximately $750,000 less than budgeted, so if the DEC and Comptroller's Office will approve the transfer, some of Pembroke's grant money will go to Corfu, plus a portion of the money pledged by GCEDC will help offset the higher-than-anticipated bids.

As part of the deal, rate payers in Pembroke's sewer district will pay 3 percent less than the rate originally set. The decrease will mean that both Corfu and Pembroke rate payers will pay $6.24 per thousand gallons of sewage.

The issue of Peterson trying to get former Trustee Al Graham banned from the sewer treatment plant was also discussed.

Peterson said he had an agreement with the owner of Camden Group, Graham's employer and contractor that runs the sewer plant, that Graham be barred from the facility.

Trustees were unanimous in telling Peterson that they thought Graham should be allowed on the property and that his expertise would be necessary during the sewer project.

Peterson said it's always been his position that if Trustee David Bielec, who is the trustee in charge of overseeing the sewer project, wanted Graham involved, than Graham could have access to the sewer property.

Bielec said he did want Graham to participate.

The board also voted 3-0, with Peterson and Trustee Keith Busch abstaining, to authorize Boylan to take legal action to recover more than $10,000 in alleged missing funds from former village justice Robert Alexander.

Peterson tried to question whether it's been proven that the funds are missing. Boylan said the village has a Comptroller's audit showing the funds are missing. He said that by law, Alexander is obligated to pay the village back for the missing funds, regardless of how the funds went missing.

Busch said he abstained because he wasn't a trustee at the time the missing funds issue first surfaced.

Peterson wasn't going to vote at all on the motion -- until goaded by village residents in attendance to say what his vote was.

Top photo: Trustee Ianni with Peterson, while Ianni complains about the lack of discussion for hiring two new police officers.

Ed Hartgrove

(Village resident Greg Lang said), "Don't say I've got to stop talking,". "I'm a taxpayer in this community. One of the highest tax payers in this community and this is ridiculous. ..."
Good for Mr. Lang. Maybe he's a fan of David Bowie/Freddy Mercury ("PRESSURE").

Also, there's been a couple mentions of an 'agreement' between (Mayor) Petersen and the owner of Camden Group, barring Mr. Graham from the sewer treatment plant. Has anyone ever SEEN said agreement?

Jun 26, 2013, 10:12am Permalink
Al Graham

Ed, At the start of every meeting he tell the residents that he will have the cops throw you out if you speak during the business part of the meeting. But that is when he is always trying to get away with something. So if you know something about what is being talked about or you know he just lied about something he tries to keep us from speaking. Greg just had enough the other night! As far as the agreement with my boss, I WANT AL GRAHAM BAND FROM THE SEWER PLANT!!!! that is the agreement he is talking about. The issue is that he doesn't the right to ban anyone without board motion

Jun 26, 2013, 1:18pm Permalink
Ed Hartgrove

Hmm-m-m! Is that even legal, Al? I mean, to have the cops throw you out if speaking during the business part of the meaning.

And, what has YOUR boss said TO YOU about entering (or not entering) the sewer property?

During 50-years of working, if MY bosses specifically told me to NOT do something, I had 2 choices. (1) Do what they told me, or, (2) Go against their orders, and risk any consequences.

Jun 26, 2013, 1:29pm Permalink
Al Graham

Ed, Peterson can say that but the board can over rule him on both issues, The board would never allow him to throw anyone out but he says before every meeting and threatens when ever I speak but then others speak and you get the smirk face like the one Howard captured above. Every single meeting he gets caught in a lie! and when confronted about it you get the smirk face and he refuses to speak and answer. As far as my boss goes he feels as long as the board over ruled him and he doesn't have to deal with all the drama that Peterson creates im back at the plant and im helping the village and town with the sewer project like I should have been all along. I must add that when it first happened my boss supported me fighting it because by law he has no right to dictate to us who works there but anyone that has had first hand dealings with him will tell you that he would have gone after our contract next if I kept going down there. So the truth is I talked to my boss and I put forth to him that I wouldn't go down till the board over ruled him.

Jun 26, 2013, 3:38pm Permalink
Ed Hartgrove

Yeah, that all figures, Al. All I can say, to you and others in Corfu, is Good Luck!
As for the look on Petersons face, I wouldn't call it a smirk. More like the look of PITY (which is, Pain In The Youknowwhat).
Good Luck, buddy!

Jun 26, 2013, 4:22pm Permalink

Authentically Local