Skip to main content

Jack Davis: Candidate or caricature?

    It was straight out of a 1930's-era movie.  Jack Davis at a Greece gas station, paying people the difference between the current cost of gas and the $1.50-a-gallon price it stood at when Bush was inaugurated.

    Quickly.  What came to mind just now?  For me and everybody else I've told about this, it was two words: "Buying votes".  It felt like a time-warp.  But then I remembered that they didn't even have TV back in the days when this sort of thing happened.  I expected to see Jack wearing a white suit and a broad-brimmed strawhat as he tossed money into the crowd, a big cigar clenched in his teeth.  Reality came rushing back, however, and I had to accept that a millionaire candidate was giving people money as part of his campaign.  Is that even legal?  It wouldn't seem so.

    This makes Jack Davis seem disconnected, at the very least.  A wealthy elitist tossing ducats into the crowd in an insulting attempt to garner publicity at the expense of honesty and respect for the voters.  In addition to believing this sort of antiquated stunt serves as serious campaigning, Jack Davis says that drilling in the Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge is one of the answers to the current cost of gasoline.  He'd have you believe that while at the same time hoping you are so ill-informed that you don't know that we won't see a drop of that oil for nearly a decade.  Our own government's Energy Information Administration says ""Seven to 12 years are estimated to be required from an approval to explore and develop to first production from the ANWR Area."  http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/analysis_publications/arcti... Even then, it would reduce the cost of a barrel of oil by a whopping 75 cents.  And all that if we allow profit bloated oil companies to sell us back the oil they took from America's national park. 

       It can't be said that Jack Davis is ignorant of economics, though.  He currently holds up to $35 million worth of oil and energy stocks.  I'd be buying people some gas, too.  But, I wouldn't be trying to buy their votes.

Lorie Longhany
lorie's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2 2008
You're right on the money, Russ -- no pun intended. Buffalo Pundit http://buffalopundit.wnymedia.net/blogs/ made a little funny comparison to Montgomery Burns on the Simpsons a while back. Photobucket I remember Jack arrogantly waving his three million dollars at our Genesee County committee function last winter. He never addressed the issues that effect us -- he just said that he would spend his 3 million to defeat his primary and general election opponents. He then walked out before dinner was served. Needless to say he did not win over any in attendance with that performance. His gimmick in Greece was just another display of arrogance. He snarled up traffic and wasted more fuel with a long line of cars idoling. Not to mention the police presence paid for on the tax payers dime. This was political theater at its finest.
John Roach
John Roach's picture
Offline
Joined: May 29 2008
If you like Davis or not, the fact that if former President Clinton had not cast a veto on it 10 years ago, we would have that oil from Alaska. Sure it would not be enough, but it would have helped. If you always say "don't do it, it will take too long", then nothing will ever get done.
Mark Potwora
mepot's picture
Offline
Joined: May 14 2008
So tell us Russ what's the answer...should we try to lower are standard of living..we need energy..to say that trying to drill for more oil domesticatly is just whistling past the graveyard is crazy..there does need to be a push for better fuel mileage...there are gas stations on every corner..how many years will to take to retrofit these places so we can run on some other fuel..until we make this great change off of fossil fuels we need to drill and find and use what we have here in the United States..ill bet you ride a bike every were you go...how do you heat your house..If theres this shortage of oil that we are running out of...how come there aren't more cars waiting to get gas..i have not seen one gas station with a sign sorry were closed no gas....solar and wind power might be part of the answer but for now oil is are main stay for energy..so you better hope we find all we can...if you believe we will be out of oil soon ,as we whistle past the graveyard
Mark Potwora
mepot's picture
Offline
Joined: May 14 2008
that was my point it will take just as long to retrofit as it will to drill..every bit helps..i thought we were trying to stop importing as much oil as we can...just as a security issue alone..its called energy independence...then our gasoline dollars stay here...but we need to head in that direction..the gas engine is not going away anytime soon..so we need oil...and just because they hold leases on those 68 million acres doesn't mean there is oil there..they know for sure there is oil in ANWR...I'm sure we both want whats the best solution to this problem..but i think too many see it a republican or democrated issue...its who can screw the other , and not whats best for the public..Do you really think because Jack Davis gave away some gas that will win him the election...they all do it..either its a free cook out to meet the person running for office..or someone give you a ride to the polls to vote..or all the rallies they have,where they pass out drinks ,hats, stickers, tshirts.. people will vote for who's best for them,and if they get a tank of gas out of it great...
Lorie Longhany
lorie's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2 2008
Here's an interesting story on Reuters via CNBC that adds another interesting tidbit to this argument. (snip) While the U.S. oil industry wants access to more federal lands to help reduce reliance on foreign suppliers, U.S.-based companies are shipping record amounts of gasoline and diesel fuel to other countries. A record 1.6 million barrels a day in U.S. refined petroleum products were exported during the first four months of this year, up 33 percent from 1.2 million barrels a day over the same period in 2007. Shipments this February topped 1.8 million barrels a day for the first time during any month, according to final numbers from the Energy Department. The surge in exports appears to contradict the pleas from the U.S. oil industry and the Bush administration for Congress to open more offshore waters and Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling. Read the rest of the story here -- http://www.cnbc.com/id/25518912
John Roach
John Roach's picture
Offline
Joined: May 29 2008
Russ, this has been coming for 30 years. To say Clinton is off the hook, or any of the others in the past is weak. We need to drill here, drill now. How are you going to get more energy. Wind? Look at all the local laws that do not allow it. Are you going to pass a law that takes local control of wind power away (May or may not be a good idea)? All the new ideas will take as long or longer to bring on line. Cuting back on energy use has been going on for years, and you know it. Now, it is going even faster, but it will not be enough. Do you support doing what Europe and Asia are doing, going nuclear? Most of the world has started, but it is still illegal in most areas around here (NY even closed on plant for political reasons). In the end, nuclear is the answer, the rest of the world (eg-France and Japan) know this. What about you?
John Roach
John Roach's picture
Offline
Joined: May 29 2008
You can not really believe we are not using less energy per person? While total use is up, that has had more to do with the economy which was going up. Ever hear of Enegy Star? Sure many people bought SUV's, but many didn't. People in this country have had conservation on their mind for years. The price of gas has been going up for years, just like gas and electric. To say every idea except more drilling is just silly. We have to do everything and all at the same time. We have to drill here, drill now, we have to conserve, we have to stop Ethanol which uses more energy than it gives (and drives up the price of food), we have to give long term tax credit to auto makes for alternative energy cars. All of it, you can not leave anything off the table.
Mark Potwora
mepot's picture
Offline
Joined: May 14 2008
I dont have the exact statistics,but most of the appliances are Energy Star compliant.I recently bought in a new gas furnace that i dont even need a chimney for,burns at 93% . I bought a refrigerator.It uses 75% less electricity than old one..sale of fluorescent bulbs are up...Everyone that i know of tries not to spend any more on energy then is needed..You must know alot of waste full people..Population grows..more energy needed..Do you think business doesn't try to trim cost where ever they can..that means energy costs..people build houses with energy saving in mind..whether is windows siding ,insulation or doors it all about efficienty .So stop with the statistics you ask John to cite and look around you....
Michael S. Cole
mscole6's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 13 2008
I've been reading your "Send us news" section and is it true (2) strip malls in Batavia? I know I've been gone along time but, if I remember correctly the city/town couldn't support a mall on Main Street! Last time I was there the place was a ghost town and looked delapitated,but now we build 2 strip mall??. What?, is all of a sudden the city slickers from Buff/Roch starting to spread there wings and head to the country,which all of a sudden makes Batavia a "hot spot" for urbanites?? I don't get it. Wazzup people?
Premium Drupal Themes