User login
Recent comments
- don't count your money just...
by william tapp - Now that is a laid-back cat....
by Dave Olsen - I agree with the 2 comments...
by Dave Olsen - Austin claims "O'Henry",...
by George Richardson - Anyone who ever read more...
by George Richardson - Right on, Peter! Government...
by C. M. Barons - Posted by Peter O'Brien on...
by Bea McManis - I agree, Thomas. Turning...
by Lorie Longhany - This is great news for...
by Thomas Mooney - Howard yoe are right , both...
by Thomas Mooney




Recent posts
- GCEDC set to break ground on new agri-business part off Route 5
- Conversations with Calliope- Immediacy and Reason
- Oliver hangs loose and wins Pet of the Week
- Dog runs under stopped car and refuses to leave
- This week at Batavia Christian Fellowship
- Something meaningful for the Oak Street Roundabout
- This week at Batavia Christian Fellowship
- Home on State Street has apparent natural gas leak
- 'Cinderella' off to a good start
- Man accused of stealing car from Tonawanda arrested by Lancaster Police
Site Sponsors
- 3 D Wine & Liquor
- Adam Miller Toy and Bicycle
- Affordable Floor Covering
- Alex's Place
- Amelia's Antiques and Collectibles
- Anglican Community Church
- Barrett's Batavia Marine and Sporting Supplies
- Batavia Cycle Center
- Batavia Downs Casino
- Blue Pearl Yoga
- Bonarigo & McCutcheon
- Bontrager's Auction
- Carlson's Studio
- Castilone Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep
- Cedar St. Sales and Rentals
- Center of Attention Auto Spa
- Center Street Smokehouse
- Charles Men's Shop
- Classic Home Improvements
- Clor's Meat Market
- The Color Salon
- Crazy Cheap Cars
- D&R Depot Restaurant
- D'n'R Fireplaces and Stoves
- Delavan's Restaurant and Tavern
- The Enchanted Florist
- Fastec Automotive
- Genesee Dental Group
- Genesee Feeds
- Great Kutz
- Herbly Wonderful
- Holland Land Office Museum
- House of K
- The Insurance Center
- Jackson St. Grill/Belladessa's
- Kravings Kafe
- Lamb Family Medicine
- Lewis and Lewis
- Main St. Pizza Company
- The Mane Attraction
- The Manor House
- Mark Lewis Agency
- Matteo & Mullen, CPA
- Matty's Pizzeria
- Max Pies
- Movies in Motion
- O'Lacy's Irish Pub
- Oliver's Candies
- Optique
- Pauly's Pizza
- Pellegrino Auto Sales
- Present Tense Books
- Pudgie's Lawn and Garden Center
- Reeb Family Moving
- Roxy's Music Store
- Select Collision
- Settler's Family Restaurant
- Small World Realty
- South Main Country Store
- Southside Deli
- Suzanne Interiors
- T.F. Brown's
- Total Image Hair Salon
- T-Shirts Etc.
- Valle Jewelers
- Vintage & Vogue Inspirations
Batavia town residents opposing consolidation dominate discussion at meeting

If the fate of town/city consolidation were to be judged by one meeting, the prospects are not good, especially from the Town of Batavia perspective.
The majority of speakers Thursday night said they were town residents. They spoke passionately of their opposition to consolidation, and their statements often elicited rousing applause from the audience.
Some 60 people attended the public forum held at Batavia High School last night.
Two themes emerged: The consolidation idea is something of a referendum on the decades-ago urban renewal in Downtown Batavia; and, a strong distrust of Albany.
"Keep in mind that the decisions that are made today will effect generations to come," said Gary Diegelman, a town resident. "Decisions that were made back in the '60s are still affecting us today like urban renewal downtown."
City resident and town land owner George Galliford sounded willing to entertain the notion of consolidation, but struck many skeptical notes.
"Being a progressive sounds very good," said Galliford. "I think people like to think of themselves as progressive. As somebody mentioned earlier at one time there were some progressives in Batavia, and they did urban renewal. There aren't a lot of people around today that would necessarily say that urban renewal and being progressive was a great thing for Batavia."
Barb Galliford questioned whether the state would continue to fund the new government agencies at the levels promised right now. If the consolidation took place, state grants to the new city (if a city form of government were chosen) would increase to $790,000, making up the bulk of an anticipated $1 million in "cost savings" for the new entity.
"And the money the state is saying they're going to give us, they cut things all the time," Galliford said. "There's no guarantee we're going to receive that every single year, or that it will even increase. As far as I'm concerned, I'm definitely not for this consolidation."
"I don't know what kind of guarantees the state can give us, because I don't have a whole lot of faith in the state," George Galliford said.
"If it's not broke, don't fix it," said Rita Towner. "My concern is, like every one else here, the state has no money. In fact the city, in the bad shape that it's in, is in better shape, I think, than the state is in."
As he has previously, Jason Molino stressed that while there are no guarantees, the state money has been very reliable in the past. Large constituencies in Buffalo, Rochester, Albany and other larger cities in the state get a far greater share of these grants and depend on it tremendously. And consolidation of local governments is a major objective for the governor and state legislature.
Some people after the meeting pointed out that there's no guarantee that the Town Board will never raise taxes either. What happens to the town, for example, if in 2018, when the current sales tax agreement with the county expires, and the county decides to no longer share that revenue. The town will be without recourse, but by state law, a city can override such a decision.
Audio Clips:
- Gary Diegelman
- Barb Galliford
- George Galliford
- Ed O'Neil
- Andy Eldridge (several people made eloquent speeches, but Andy's was especially poignant)
- Lynn Freeman, after the meeting
- Jason Molino, after the meeting
- Steve Lockwood, after the meeting
- Howard Owens
- Login or register to post comments
Similar entries
- Idea of one Batavia gets more favorable airing in second consolidation meeting
- Consolidation committee recommends work start on new charter with vote in 2011
- Committee ready to release final report on consolidation
- Consolidation, or new charter, city will need to decide which to put on November ballot
- Consolidation: Four most common questions...
Weather for Batavia, NY

Current Conditions:
Partly Cloudy, 61 F
Forecast:
Sat - Partly Cloudy. High: 59 Low: 45
Sun - Sunny. High: 62 Low: 47
Full Forecast at Yahoo! Weather
(provided by The Weather Channel)


-
November 7, 2009 - 8:00am - 3:00pm
-
November 9, 2009 - 4:00pm - 8:00pm
-
November 11, 2009 - 5:00pm - 9:30pm
-
November 12, 2009 - 6:00pm - 8:00pm
-
November 14, 2009 - 9:00am - 3:00pm


















































We CAN vote NO when the vote comes up... Don't stay home, get involved!
The committee tried to tell us that if we become a new "city"... we can bargain for more of the sales tax collected. What they don't seem to understand is that if they take more from the county - the county will have to raise our county taxes. The county doesn't have a surplus either. So if the city takes more money - the county has to raise the taxes from us anyway.
Let the committee know that you don't like the idea of "one Batavia".
The Committee did not say you can bargain for more sales tax. I was the one who brought the question up about the tax.
The "new" city/town would get just what they both get now, no more and no less until 2018.
That year (2018), the sales tax contract with the County is up and you go back to the table for a new deal
The town will have no leverage. The city, on the other hand, as it's been explained to me, will have leverage. That's the way the state laws are written.
I'm not saying that as a proponent of consolidation, just stating what I understand to be the facts of the situation.
The town residents made a lot of comments about not being able to predict the future regarding state grants to cities. They could very well go away (and I think the weakest part of the argument for consolidation is the over reliance on state grants to achieve "cost savings.") Well, neither can the town residents predict the future about their own taxes. It's not written in stone that there will never be a town tax.
Example 1: 16,000 city vote for consolidation. 6,000 town vote against. Since both city AND town must agree to consolidate, vote fails due to town turning down the resolution.
OR
Example 2: 16,000 city + 6,000 town = 23,000 vote on consolidation. Majority rule, city wins, and consolidation goes through.
Both examples seem to make the voting moot.
Example 1, clearly few from the town want consolidation, they vote no, consolidation fails since both the city AND the town must agree to consolidation. (What's the point of having the city vote in this scenario?)
Example 2, city has more people than town, in a combined vote, majority rules, city easily wins, consolidation passes. (In this scenario, what's the point of even asking the town to vote?)
Then, both the town and city, in seperate votes have to approve it. If either one votes no, it's dead.
So the city could vote yes and the town no. The deal is dead
If consolidation is approved, then the issue of population comes into play (majority rules). Truth is nobody knows what the rules will be or who will write them.